EN GR
RESEARCH PAPER
Differentials in pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviours among postpartum women in Osun State, Nigeria: Implication for Innovative Service Delivery Model
 
More details
Hide details
1
Medical and Health Services, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
 
2
Department of Nursing Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
 
 
Submission date: 2025-04-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-03
 
 
Publication date: 2025-09-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Kolade Afolayan Afolabi   

Medical and Health Services, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria
 
 
ΕΛΕΥΘΩ 2025;24(3):9
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Maternal health remains a crucial public health phenomenon, with unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions contributing significantly to global maternal morbidity and mortality. Addressing the gap between reproductive intentions and contraceptive behaviours, therefore, remains vital towards empowering women to make informed reproductive health decisions. Our study aimed to identify patterns of pregnancy intentions, examine contraceptive behaviors, and investigate the association between pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviors. The study also examined determinants of contraceptive behaviors among postpartum women in Osun State, Nigeria.

Methods:
A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among 377 women who were within six months postpartum and selected through a multistage sampling technique in Osun State, Nigeria. Data was collected using the intervieweradministered London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy, while the Innovative Service Delivery Model provided the theoretical framework. Analysis was performed using SPSS software version 25 at univariate, bivariate, and multivariate levels. Chisquare and binary logistic regression analyses examined the association between dependent and independent variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results:
Findings showed that 37.4% of postpartum women reported index pregnancies as unplanned, 27.3% had a negative attitude towards contraception, 66.0% reported non-use of any contraception, 57.8% made contraceptive decisions solely, while 22.5% made contraceptive decisions jointly with spouses. Contraceptive behaviour of 76.1% were considered ineffective, though no significant association was observed between pregnancy intentions and contraceptive behaviours, main predictors of contraceptive behaviours however include multiparity (P=0.04, OR =0.22, CI=0.805-0.95), positive attitude (P<0.001, OR=7.37, CI=2.68-20.24), length of postpartum period (P=0.004, OR = 3.88, CI=1.54-9.73).

Conclusions:
An innovative service delivery model that promotes a positive attitude towards contraception, encourages timely access and uptake of postpartum contraceptive services, and discourages higher-order parity through collaborative approaches remains essential for effective contraception, reducing unplanned pregnancies, and mitigating the risks and consequences of unsafe abortions in our study setting.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge Katherine Masyn for her guidance on the analyses for this manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
FUNDING
There was no source of funding for this research.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Institute of Public Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife (Approval number: IPH/OAU/12/961; Date: …). Permission was also obtained from the authorities of Irewole and Ife Central LGAs where this study was undertaken. Verbal and written consent was obtained from each participant prior to data collection.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The data supporting this research are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
PEER REVIEW INFORMATION
Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
KAA was responsible for research instrument design and validation, supervised data collection, undertook data analysis, interpretations and final manuscript write up. AOA undertook initial conceptualization, design, review of literature, secured ethical approval and proof reading of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Abortion. World Health Organization. December 8, 2025. Accessed December 30, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/...
 
2.
Dehingia N, Dixit A, Atmavilas Y, et al. Unintended pregnancy and maternal health complications: cross-sectional analysis of data from rural Uttar Pradesh, India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):188. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-2848-8
 
3.
Nearly half of all pregnancies are unintended—a global crisis, says new UNFPA report. United Nations. Population Fund (UNFPA). March 30, 2022. Accessed December 30, 2025. https://www.unfpa.org/press/ne...
 
4.
Hagos KN, Gesese AA. Process evaluation of postpartum contraceptive service delivery in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia in 2020. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):794. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09467-8
 
5.
Nugussa B, Solomon T, Tadelu H. Modern Postpartum family planning and associated factors among postpartum women in a rural district of Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study. Inquiry. 2023;60:469580231153268. doi:10.1177/00469580231153268
 
6.
Adane B, Addisu E, Yalew M, et al. Time to postpartum family planning initiation and its predictors among mothers coming for first measles vaccination at Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia, Dessie Model Clinic, Northeast Ethiopia: cox-regression model. Reprod Health. 2023;20(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12978-023-01608-w
 
7.
Ajong AB, Yakum MN, Mangala FN, et al. Contraceptive experience and factors associated with desire for postpartum family planning among pregnant women of the nkongsamba health district, Littoral Region, Cameroon. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12905-025-03546-0
 
8.
Anyatonwu OP, Nwoku KA, Jonsson H, Namatovu F. The determinants of postpartum contraceptive use in Nigeria. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023;4:1284614. doi:10.3389/fgwh.2023.1284614
 
9.
MacQuarrie KLD, Aziz A. Women's decision-making and contraceptive use in Pakistan: an analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):1-71. doi:10.1080/26410397.2021.2020953
 
10.
Hategekimana JB, Ndikubwimana A, Ndayisenga J, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and strategies on contraceptive utilization among adolescents: views from beneficiaries and parents in City of Kigali. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024;9(1):61. doi:10.1186/s40834-024-00317-4
 
11.
Agha S, Morgan B, Archer H, Paul S, Babigumira JB, Guthrie BL. Understanding how social norms affect modern contraceptive use. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11110-2
 
12.
Tiruneh GA, Erega BB, T/Mariam AB, et al. Level of knowledge, attitude, and practice on modern contraceptive method and its associated factors among housemaids living in Debre Tabor town, northwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):1-10. doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02783-5
 
13.
Atuhaire S, Ngendakumana J, Galadima A, Adam A, Muderhwa RB. Knowledge and attitude towards contraceptive use among adolescents in Africa: a systematic review. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021;10(11);4292-4303. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20214349
 
14.
Afolabi AO, Olaogun AA, Afolabi KA. Contraceptive Preference and Associated Factors: Implication on Pregnancy Intentions among Nursing Mothers in Southwest Nigeria. Women’s Health Bulletin. 2020;7(4). doi:10.30476/whb.2020.87503.1074
 
15.
O'Brien ML, Nur AA. Who actualizes postpartum contraceptive intentions? A trajectory cluster analysis. Reprod Health. 2024;21(1):169. doi:10.1186/s12978-024-01899-7
 
16.
Rothschild CW, Richardson BA, Guthrie BL, et al. Contributions of side effects to contraceptive discontinuation and method switch among Kenyan women: a prospective cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;129(6):926-937. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17032
 
17.
Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO, Armah-Ansah EK, et al. Women’s household decision-making power and contraceptive use in Mali. Reprod Health. 2022;19(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12978-022-01534-3
 
18.
Family planning/contraception methods. World Health Organization. July 3, 2025. Accessed December 30, 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/...
 
19.
Edelmann S. The innovative healthcare delivery models that will drive patient-centered care. HealthcareTransformers. Published online 2023:1-10.
 
20.
Afolabi AO, Olaogun AA, Afolabi KA, Afolabi EK. Determinants of unintended pregnancies among nursing mothers in southwest Nigeria. African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health. 2020:14:1-17. doi:10.12968/ajmw.2019.0010
 
21.
Barrett G, Smith SC, Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(5):426-433. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.014787
 
22.
Lang AY, Hall JA, Boyle JA, et al. Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220774. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220774
 
23.
Das S, Hall J, Barrett G, Osrin D, Kapadia S, Jayaraman A. Evaluation of the Hindi version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant and postnatal women in urban India. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):602. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04075-y
 
24.
Muleva BR, Borges ALV, Hall JA, Barrett G. Evaluation of the Portuguese version of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Mozambique: a psychometric measurement study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022;26(2):47-57. doi:10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i2.5
 
25.
Borges AL, Barrett G, Dos Santos OA, Nascimento Nde C, Cavalhieri FB, Fujimori E. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Brazilian Portuguese. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):244. doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1037-2
 
26.
Ayele A, Abdurashid N, Hailu M, Tefera B. Unintended Pregnancy and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care unit in public health facilities of Dire Dawa City, Eastern Ethiopia, 2021. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2023;2023:8100462. doi:10.1155/2023/8100462
 
27.
Carlander A, Hultstrand JN, Reuterwall I, Jonsson M, Tydén T, Kullinger M. Unplanned pregnancy and the association with maternal health and pregnancy outcomes: a Swedish cohort study. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0286052. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286052
 
28.
Ranatunga IDJC, Jayaratne K. Proportion of unplanned pregnancies, their determinants and health outcomes of women delivering at a teaching hospital in Sri Lanka. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):667. doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03259-2
 
29.
Kasso T, Alegbeleye JO. Knowledge, attitude and practice of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Advances in Reproductive Sciences. 2023;11:93-105. doi:10.4236/arsci.2023.114009
 
30.
Tesfa D, Tiruneh SA, Azanaw MM, et al. Determinants of contraceptive decision making among married women in Sub-Saharan Africa from the recent Demographic and Health Survey data. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):52. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01636-x
 
31.
D'Souza MS, Karkada SN, Parahoo K, Venkatesaperumal R. Perception of and satisfaction with the clinical learning environment among nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(6):833-840. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.005
 
32.
Dam A, Yeh PT, Burke AE, Kennedy CE. Contraceptive values and preferences of pregnant women, postpartum women, women seeking emergency contraceptives, and women seeking abortion services: a systematic review. Contraception. 2022;111:39-47. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.007
 
ISSN:1106-6822
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top